A Concise Defense of the Historicity of the Bible

 

  1. Is the Bible historically reliable?

 

A common critique: the composition of the New Testament is like a massive game of “telephone” where the message is inevitably lost.

 

Is that true?

 

Manuscript evidence: The Illiad vs. The New Testament

 

 

Non Christian Attestation:

“he assembled the sanhedrin of judges, and brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James, and some others” – Josephus, Antiquities, Book 20, Ch. 9, 1 (94 AD)

 

“About this time there appeared Jesus, a wise man. For he was a doer of startling deeds, a teacher of people who receive the truth with pleasure. And he gained a following both among many Jews and among many of Greek origin. And when Pilate, because of an accusation made by the leading men among us, condemned him to the cross, those who had loved him previously did not cease to do so. And up until this very day the tribe of Christians, named after him, has not died out.” - Josephus, Antiquities, Book 18, Chapter 3, 3 (94 AD)

 

“Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome” - Tacitus, Annals, 15.44 (105-109 AD)

 

“On the Eve of Passover they hung Yeshu the Notzarine And the herald went out before him for 40 days [saying]: “Yeshu the Notzarine will go out to be stoned for sorcery and misleading and enticing Israel [to idolatry]....so they hung him on the Eve of Passover.” - Babylonian Sanhedrin 43a

 

 Those who denied that they were or had been Christians, when they invoked the gods in words dictated by me, offered prayer with incense and wine to your image, which I had ordered to be brought for this purpose together with statues of the gods, and moreover cursed Christ--none of which those who are really Christians, it is said, can be forced to do--these I thought should be discharged…They asserted, however, that the sum and substance of their fault or error had been that they were accustomed to meet on a fixed day before dawn and sing responsively a hymn to Christ as to a god, and to bind themselves by oath, not to some crime, but not to commit fraud, theft, or adultery, not falsify their trust, nor to refuse to return a trust when called upon to do so. When this was over, it was their custom to depart and to assemble again to partake of food--but ordinary and innocent food. Even this, they affirmed, they had ceased to do after my edict by which, in accordance with your instructions, I had forbidden political associations. Accordingly, I judged it all the more necessary to find out what the truth was by torturing two female slaves who were called deaconesses. But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. – Pliny’s Letter to Trajan, 111-113 AD